← All companies ← STZ Manual SUN → ← NXRT REITs — Residential TCI →
SUI, Sun Communities Inc.
We are a fully integrated real estate investment trust.
OVERVIEW Sun Communities, Inc., and all wholly-owned or majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries, including Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership, a Michigan limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), Sun Home Services, Inc.
For our MH and RV businesses, we lease individual parcels of land, or sites, with utility access for the placement of manufactured homes and RVs to our MH and RV customers.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report Est. 8/3–8/7 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late June · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~32 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on cyclicality & demand, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Operating cash per share has compounded about 7% a year across the record. The dividend takes 118% of FFO, more than it earns. Debt is 62% of assets, heavy for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $834M | $983M | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $2.3B | $3.0B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.3B | RevenueRevenue |
| $26M | $72M | $107M | $162M | $132M | $408M | $261M | ($207M) | $104M | $1.4B | $1.4B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $222M | $262M | $287M | $328M | $377M | $523M | $602M | $494M | $491M | $508M | $517M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $241M | $258M | $363M | $477M | $543M | $754M | $735M | $791M | $861M | $864M | $890M | Cash from operationsOp. cash |
| — | — | — | — | $313M | $391M | $434M | $475M | $491M | $1.0B | $1.1B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| — | — | — | — | 58% | 52% | 59% | 60% | 57% | 121% | 118% | Dividend / operating cashPayout |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ($1.6B) | ($402M) | ($734M) | ($1.0B) | ($2.5B) | ($2.3B) | ($3.1B) | ($920M) | ($267M) | $4.9B | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| $1.3B | $142M | $410M | $506M | $2.0B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $80M | ($572M) | ($5.2B) | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($73K) | $298K | ($523K) | $411K | $200K | ($200K) | ($9M) | $1M | ($800K) | $2M | — | Exchange-rate effectFX |
| ($34M) | ($2M) | $39M | ($27M) | $58M | ($14M) | $12M | ($48M) | $21M | $572M | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $6.5B | $6.9B | $7.6B | $8.9B | $11.7B | $13.8B | $16.7B | $17.7B | $14.1B | $14.5B | $14.6B | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $5.9B | $6.1B | $6.7B | $7.8B | $11.2B | $13.5B | $17.1B | $16.9B | $16.5B | $12.5B | $12.4B | Total assetsAssets |
| 53% | 50% | 47% | 41% | 42% | 42% | 42% | 46% | 45% | 20% | 62% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $3.1B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $4.8B | $5.7B | $7.2B | $7.8B | $7.4B | $2.5B | $7.7B | Total debtDebt |
| $3.1B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $4.7B | $5.6B | $7.2B | $7.8B | $7.3B | $1.9B | $7.2B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $119M | $127M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $128M | Interest expenseInt. exp. |
| 3.9× | 4.3× | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.7× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | $3.4B | $3.5B | $3.8B | $5.3B | $6.5B | $9.0B | $9.5B | $9.1B | $5.2B | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| — | $43M | $64M | $78M | $264M | $289M | $203M | $261M | $260M | $256M | — | Redeemable interestsRedeemable |
| — | $65M | $60M | $56M | $102M | $107M | $79M | $90M | $111M | $117M | — | Noncontrolling interestsNCI |
| $2.3B | $2.6B | $3.1B | $3.8B | $5.5B | $6.6B | $7.8B | $7.1B | $7.1B | $7.0B | $6.8B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 66.3M | 76.7M | 82.0M | 88.9M | 97.5M | 115M | 123M | 124M | 127M | 125M | 126M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| — | — | — | — | $3.21 | $3.40 | $3.53 | $3.84 | $3.86 | $8.36 | $8.39 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $34.61 | $33.87 | $37.87 | $42.96 | $56.67 | $57.55 | $63.55 | $57.21 | $55.67 | $55.69 | $53.81 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +4.4%/yr | +5.2%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +31.8%/yr | +13.8%/yr |
| EPS | +45.1%/yr | +53.0%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +21.1%/yr (5-yr) | +21.1%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +0.9%/yr | −7.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | +5.4%/yr | −0.3%/yr |
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- What an owner could take out $407M to $864MA range, because the filings do not split maintenance from expansionBetween cash from operations less all capital spending $864M − $457M = $407M, and cash from operations $864M
What this means
Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.
- Ordinary for propertyCash from operations $864M ÷ real estate at cost $14.5B
What this means
The cash the properties throw off, measured against what they cost to acquire and build rather than against a market value nobody filed. Read it across the record: a portfolio whose yield on cost is rising is either raising rents faster than it is adding buildings, or buying well. Gross cost is used deliberately, so accumulated depreciation cannot shrink the denominator and flatter the return.
- Not covered by operating cashDividends $1.0B ÷ cash from operations $864M
What this means
A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether the cash covers it. This is a harder test than the industry's usual one: funds from operations adds depreciation back without deducting the capital that genuinely keeps buildings competitive, so a distribution can look covered on that measure and still be funded by borrowing or by selling buildings. Above 100% of operating cash, it is being funded by something other than the properties.
- Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
What this means
Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.
Is it sound?
- Debt / assets 59%ElevatedTotal debt $7.4B ÷ assets $12.5BIndustry peers: median 40%
What this means
Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.
- Not enough data
What this means
Operating income or interest is missing, or operating income sits far below net income (a triple-net REIT's lease income bypasses the operating line), so an EBITDA coverage would mislead — read it on net income against the interest bill, and on debt / assets, instead.
- Consolidated accounts only
What this means
These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$551M written down across 2 years (2023, 2024): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $14.8M | $31.6M | $231M |
| 2022 | $15.9M | −$538k | $133M |
| 2023 | $11.9M | −$21k | $783M |
| 2024 | $2.7M | −$2.0M | $831M |
| 2025 | $12.5M | $12.9M | $407M |
| 2025 | $9.9M | $9.6M | $407M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership1.6%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio302:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$37M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 1.6% of revenue, equal to 6.8% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Peers, Residential REITs
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Cash marginmedian over the record | Cash / assetsmedian over the record | Dividend / cashmedian over the record | Debt / assetsmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQREquity Residential | $3.1B | 52% | 6.8% | 64% | 40% |
| AVBAvalonBay Communities Inc. | $3.0B | 56% | 6.9% | 62% | 40% |
| SUISun Communities Inc. | $2.3B | 34% | 5.0% | 58% | 44% |
| MAAMid-America Apartment Communities Inc. | $2.2B | 49% | 7.9% | 57% | 40% |
| ESSEssex Property Trust Inc. | $1.9B | 59% | 7.1% | 59% | 47% |
| AMHAmerican Homes 4 Rent | $1.9B | 42% | 5.2% | 21% | 35% |
| UDRUDR Inc. | $1.7B | 53% | 7.1% | 63% | 50% |
| ELSEquity Lifestyle Properties Inc. | $1.5B | 39% | 10.0% | 55% | 60% |
| Group median | — | 50% | 7.0% | 58% | 42% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFA reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).
Manual order: ← STZ its page in the Manual SUN →
Industry order: ← NXRT the REITs — Residential chapter TCI →