Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← HIVE Manual HL → ← ESRT REITs — Office HPP →

HIW, Highwoods Properties

Highwoods Properties, Inc., headquartered in Raleigh, is a publicly-traded real estate investment trust.

We are in the work-placemaking business and believe that by creating exceptional environments and experiences, we can deliver greater value to our customers, their teammates and, in turn, our shareholders.

By creating and operating commute-worthy places, we support the growth and success of our customers and contribute to the vitality of our communities.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
HIW · Highwoods Properties
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$806M
−2.4% YoY · 2% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $836M 5-yr avg $813M
Cash margin 46% 5-yr avg 49%
Dividend / operating cash 57% 5-yr avg 53%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is led by Raleigh, NC (22%) and Nashville, TN (19%), with 6 more segments behind.
What moves the needle
Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Operating cash per share has been roughly flat (1% a year). The dividend takes 57% of FFO, and is covered. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

The biggest segment, Raleigh, NC, is also where the profit is made: 22% of revenue and 25% of segment operating profit.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
Operating profit same segments
  • Raleigh, NC22%$181M25% of profit
  • Nashville, TN19%$157M21% of profit
  • Atlanta, GA18%$145M16% of profit
  • Charlotte, NC12%$93M12% of profit
  • Tampa, FL11%$88M10% of profit
  • Orlando, FL7%$57M7% of profit
  • Other11%$85M10% of profit

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMJun 2026
Income statement
$666M$703M$720M$736M$737M$768M$829M$834M$826M$806M$836MRevenueRevenue
$522M$183M$169M$134M$345M$311M$157M$146M$100M$157M$166MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
$220M$228M$230M$255M$242M$259M$288M$299M$299M$295M$305MDepreciationDeprec.
$306M$353M$359M$366M$358M$415M$422M$387M$404M$359M$384MCash from operationsOp. cash
$167M$181M$191M$197M$199M$204M$210M$211M$212M$217M$219MDividends paidDiv. paid
Balance sheet
55%51%53%54%56%49%50%55%53%60%57%Dividend / operating cashPayout
Cash flow & returns
$216M($200M)($307M)($607M)$111M($288M)($615M)($170M)($302M)($441M)Investing cash flowInv. cash
($465M)($143M)($130M)$246M($294M)($285M)$188M($205M)($99M)$91MFinancing cash flowFin. cash
$57M$10M($78M)$5M$175M($158M)($5M)$12M$2M$9MChange in cashΔ cash
Balance sheet
$5.1B$5.2B$5.5B$5.9B$5.8B$6.5B$6.7B$6.7B$6.6B$7.0B$7.0BReal estate (gross)RE gross
$4.6B$4.6B$4.7B$5.1B$5.2B$5.7B$6.1B$6.0B$6.0B$6.3B$6.5BTotal assetsAssets
$77M$69M$71M$82M$81M$86M$105M$137M$147M$152M$162MInterest expenseInt. exp.
5.7×6.7×6.7×6.0×6.2×6.2×5.4×4.1×3.8×3.6×3.5×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$2.3B$2.2B$2.3B$2.8B$2.7B$3.1B$3.5B$3.5B$3.6B$3.8BTotal liabilitiesTotal liab.
$145M$144M$106M$133M$112M$112M$66M$50M$66M$53MRedeemable interestsRedeemable
$18M$17M$18M$22M$22M$22M$22M$5M$4M$4MNoncontrolling interestsNCI
$2.1B$2.2B$2.2B$2.2B$2.3B$2.5B$2.5B$2.4B$2.4B$2.4B$2.4BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
101M106M106M106M107M107M108M108M108M111M112MShares out (diluted)Shares
$1.65$1.71$1.80$1.85$1.87$1.91$1.95$1.96$1.96$1.96$1.95Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$21.07$21.02$21.14$20.22$21.89$23.14$23.03$22.58$21.80$21.52$21.29Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+1.2%/yr+1.1%/yr
EPS−13.3%/yr−15.1%/yr
Dividends / share+2.0%/yr+1.0%/yr
Book value / share+0.2%/yr−0.3%/yr
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Before capital spending
    Cash from operations $359M · capital spending not separately filed
    What this means

    Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.

  • Ordinary for property
    Cash from operations $359M ÷ real estate at cost $7.0B
    What this means

    The cash the properties throw off, measured against what they cost to acquire and build rather than against a market value nobody filed. Read it across the record: a portfolio whose yield on cost is rising is either raising rents faster than it is adding buildings, or buying well. Gross cost is used deliberately, so accumulated depreciation cannot shrink the denominator and flatter the return.

  • Covered
    Dividends $217M ÷ cash from operations $359M
    What this means

    A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether the cash covers it. This is a harder test than the industry's usual one: funds from operations adds depreciation back without deducting the capital that genuinely keeps buildings competitive, so a distribution can look covered on that measure and still be funded by borrowing or by selling buildings. Above 100% of operating cash, it is being funded by something other than the properties.

  • Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
    What this means

    Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.

Is it sound?

  • Leverage
    Not enough data
    What this means

    Debt or total assets missing.

  • Strong
    (operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $152M
    Industry peers: median 3.6×
    What this means

    How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. The bill counted here is every dollar of interest the trust incurred, including the part it charged into the cost of buildings under construction rather than against this year's earnings — that money is paid to lenders all the same, and leaving it out flatters exactly the trusts doing the most building. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.

  • Consolidated accounts only
    What this means

    These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Net income
2021Theodore J. Klinck$4.1M$4.7M$311M
2022Theodore J. Klinck$5.0M$2.6M$157M
2023Theodore J. Klinck$4.7M$3.0M$146M
2024Theodore J. Klinck$5.1M$8.7M$100M
2025Theodore J. Klinck$5.1M$3.5M$157M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership1.3%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$8M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 1.0% of revenue, equal to 1.5% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Acquisitions as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Office REITs

The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.

CompanyRevenuelatest FY, USDCash marginmedian over the recordCash / assetsmedian over the recordDividend / cashmedian over the recordDebt / assetsmedian over the record
KRCKilroy Realty$1.1B52%5.1%46%39%
DEIDouglas Emmett$1.0B48%4.7%38%53%
SLGSL Green Realty$1.0B30%2.7%88%27%
CUZCousins Properties$994M46%4.8%48%31%
HIWHighwoods Properties$806M49%6.9%54%
ESRTEmpire State Realty Trust Inc.$768M32%5.5%16%20%
CDPCopt Defense Properties$764M39%6.2%47%52%
JBGSJBG SMITH Properties$499M29%3.0%56%35%
Group median43%5.0%47%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

A reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Highwoods Properties (HIW), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/HIW, data as of 2026-07-18.

Manual order: ← HIVE its page in the Manual HL →

Industry order: ← ESRT the REITs — Office chapter HPP →