← All companies ← ETON Manual ETSY → ← ES Electric Utilities FE →
ETR, Entergy Corporation
A regulated utility, earning a set return on the capital it sinks into its network.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Regulated utility. Returns are set by regulation on an approved rate base; the capital spending regulators approve becomes the growth, recovered through allowed rates. Capital build-out. Capital spending has surged to 59% of sales, today's earnings are charged less depreciation than tomorrow's will be. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 15% through the cycle, a solid margin the cost base and competition set as much as the price does. The margin is cyclical, swinging between −7.5% and 25% over the years, so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year — and the balance sheet at the trough more than the peak. Capital spending runs about 36% of sales, well above depreciation, so the return earned on what it sinks into that plant weighs as much as the margin. Read this kind of business on rate base and the allowed return. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on supplier & input dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 5%, above 15% in 0 of 9 years). By owner earnings: roughly 13% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Modest returns here are the design, not a verdict: a regulated utility's prices are set by commission, so the questions are the return the regulator allows, how fast the invested base it earns that return on is growing, and the health of the relationship with the commissions that decide both — all of which live in the 10-K, not the multiple.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
Revenue up 5.9% year over year; operating income up 1.5%
figures computed from the filing's XBRL
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $10.8B | $11.1B | $11.0B | $10.9B | $10.1B | $11.7B | $13.8B | $12.1B | $11.9B | $12.9B | $13.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| ($815M) | $1.4B | $469M | $1.4B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $2.1B | $2.6B | $2.7B | $3.2B | $3.1B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −7.5% | 12.3% | 4.3% | 12.8% | 17.5% | 15.7% | 14.9% | 21.6% | 22.3% | 24.7% | 22.9% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($1.4B) | $968M | ($174M) | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.7B | $1.4B | $2.3B | — | Pretax incomePretax |
| ($584M) | $412M | $849M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $2.4B | $1.1B | $1.8B | $1.8B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | 56% | — | — | -9% | 15% | -4% | — | 26% | 22% | 21% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $3.0B | $2.6B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $2.7B | $2.3B | $2.6B | $4.3B | $4.5B | $5.2B | $6.1B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $2.1B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.4B | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $1.5B | $133M | ($504M) | ($607M) | ($956M) | ($808M) | ($503M) | ($114M) | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.9B | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $2.8B | $3.6B | $3.9B | $4.2B | $247M | $168M | $5.1B | $4.4B | $4.8B | $7.7B | $9.0B | CapexCapex |
| 25.6% | 32.6% | 35.8% | 38.6% | 2.4% | 1.4% | 36.8% | 36.6% | 40.7% | 59.4% | 67.1% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $875M | $545M | $345M | $634M | $2.4B | $2.1B | $600M | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.8B | $3.7B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 8.1% | 4.9% | 3.1% | 5.8% | 24.2% | 18.2% | 4.4% | 18.5% | 19.0% | 22.0% | 27.5% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $218M | ($984M) | ($1.6B) | ($1.4B) | $2.4B | $2.1B | ($2.5B) | ($146M) | ($350M) | ($2.5B) | ($3.0B) | Free cash flowFCF |
| 2.0% | −8.9% | −14.1% | −12.7% | 24.2% | 18.2% | −18.0% | −1.2% | −2.9% | −19.6% | −22.0% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $612M | $629M | $648M | $712M | $748M | $775M | $842M | $918M | $982M | $1.1B | $1.1B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| ($3.9B) | ($3.8B) | ($4.1B) | ($4.5B) | ($4.8B) | ($6.2B) | ($5.7B) | ($4.6B) | ($5.8B) | ($7.1B) | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| $688M | $811M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $3.4B | $2.6B | $2.9B | $243M | $2.1B | $3.0B | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($163M) | ($407M) | ($300M) | ($55M) | $1.3B | ($1.3B) | ($218M) | ($92M) | $727M | $1.1B | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| -3% | 3% | — | 5% | 6% | 4% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 6% | 5% | ROICROIC |
| -7% | 5% | 10% | 12% | 13% | 10% | 9% | 16% | 7% | 10% | 10% | Return on equityROE |
| −15% | −3% | 2% | 5% | 6% | 3% | 2% | 10% | 0% | 4% | 4% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $1.2B | $781M | $481M | $426M | $1.8B | $443M | $224M | $133M | $860M | $1.9B | $3.9B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.4B | — | — | $1.6B | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $2.6B | $2.7B | Accounts payablePayables |
| ($115M) | ($239M) | ($382M) | ($291M) | ($1.5B) | ($1.2B) | ($282M) | ($173M) | — | — | ($1.1B) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $3.7B | $3.3B | $3.0B | $3.0B | $4.6B | $3.6B | $4.1B | $3.7B | $4.4B | $5.8B | $8.2B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $3.2B | $5.0B | $5.4B | $5.6B | $7.1B | $6.2B | $6.4B | $6.4B | $6.1B | $7.8B | $9.0B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.2× | 0.7× | 0.5× | 0.5× | 0.6× | 0.6× | 0.6× | 0.6× | 0.7× | 0.7× | 0.9× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $234M | $261M | $304M | $333M | $343M | $358M | $366M | $419M | $424M | $482M | — | Net PP&ENet PP&E |
| $4.8B | $4.9B | $4.7B | $5.3B | $6.1B | $6.6B | $6.0B | $5.7B | $5.3B | $5.0B | — | Regulatory assetsReg. assets |
| $377M | $377M | $377M | $377M | $377M | $377M | $377M | $374M | $368M | $368M | $368M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $45.9B | $46.7B | $48.3B | $51.7B | $58.2B | $59.5B | $58.6B | $59.7B | $64.8B | $71.9B | $79.0B | Total assetsAssets |
| $14.8B | $15.1B | $16.2B | $17.9B | $22.4B | $25.9B | $25.9B | $25.1B | $28.0B | $30.3B | $33.1B | Total debtDebt |
| $13.6B | $14.3B | $15.7B | $17.4B | $20.6B | $25.4B | $25.7B | $25.0B | $27.1B | $28.3B | $29.2B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $666M | $662M | $707M | $742M | $786M | $835M | $912M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.5B | Interest expenseInt. exp. |
| -1.2× | 2.1× | 0.7× | 1.9× | 2.3× | 2.2× | 2.2× | 2.6× | 2.3× | 2.4× | 2.1× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | — | $0 | $35M | $35M | $68M | $98M | $120M | — | — | — | Noncontrolling interestsNCI |
| $8.1B | $8.0B | $8.8B | $10.2B | $10.9B | $11.6B | $13.0B | $14.6B | $15.1B | $16.9B | $18.2B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 358M | 361M | 367M | 394M | 402M | 404M | 411M | 425M | 432M | 450M | 466M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $30.31 | $30.67 | $30.02 | $27.61 | $25.15 | $29.08 | $33.48 | $28.60 | $27.53 | $28.76 | $28.91 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-1.63 | $1.14 | $2.31 | $3.15 | $3.45 | $2.77 | $2.68 | $5.55 | $2.45 | $3.91 | $3.85 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $2.45 | $1.51 | $0.94 | $1.61 | $6.07 | $5.28 | $1.46 | $5.28 | $5.23 | $6.32 | $7.96 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.61 | $-2.73 | $-4.24 | $-3.51 | $6.07 | $5.28 | $-6.03 | $-0.34 | $-0.81 | $-5.63 | $-6.38 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $1.71 | $1.74 | $1.77 | $1.81 | $1.86 | $1.92 | $2.05 | $2.16 | $2.27 | $2.39 | $2.45 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $7.77 | $9.99 | $10.75 | $10.65 | $0.61 | $0.42 | $12.32 | $10.45 | $11.21 | $17.07 | $19.40 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $22.59 | $22.14 | $24.11 | $25.95 | $27.17 | $28.82 | $31.54 | $34.43 | $34.95 | $37.59 | $39.09 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2022 are restated ×2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −0.6%/yr | +2.7%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +11.1%/yr | +0.8%/yr |
| EPS | — | +2.5%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +3.8%/yr | +5.1%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +9.1%/yr | +94.4%/yr |
| Book value / share | +5.8%/yr | +6.7%/yr |
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business earned $2.8B of owner earnings, the operating cash left after the $2.3B it takes just to hold its position. It put $5.4B more into growth; free cash flow, after that spending, was ($2.5B).
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $1.8B | $1.1B | $2.4B | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$2.3B | +$2.2B | +$2.1B | +$2.0B | +$2.0B |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$1.1B | +$1.2B | −$114M | −$503M | −$808M |
| Cash from operations | $5.2B | $4.5B | $4.3B | $2.6B | $2.3B |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$2.3B | −$2.2B | −$2.1B | −$2.0B | −$168M |
| Owner earnings | $2.8B | $2.3B | $2.2B | $600M | $2.1B |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | −$5.4B | −$2.6B | −$2.4B | −$3.1B | — |
| Free cash flow | ($2.5B) | ($350M) | ($146M) | ($2.5B) | $2.1B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 22% | 19% | 18% | 4% | 18% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position (here about $2.3B, roughly its depreciation, the rate its assets wear out). The other $5.4B of its capital spending is growth it chose, not upkeep it owed; charged only with the maintenance it must do, the business earns well more than the year's free cash flow shows.
A regulated utility reads differently here. What it spends above depreciation goes into rate base, where the commission lets it earn the allowed return and recover the capital, with interest, over decades — growth that is financed, not taken out of owners' pockets this year. So the truth sits between the bridge's two ends: owner earnings excuses the build-out entirely, free cash flow charges it entirely, and the scorecard's utility-plant figure shows how fast the base earning that return is compounding.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
The allowed return, earned and credited
- Earning the allowed returnMedian over 10 readable years · latest FY2025: 10.4% (net income $1.8B ÷ equity $16.9B)
What this means
A commission caps what a regulated utility may earn on shareholders' capital, so the question is not whether the return is high but whether the company actually earns what it is allowed — persistent under-earning means costs the regulator will not put in rates, and a return above the band usually means unregulated businesses in the mix. Read through the record, because a single year carries rate-case timing noise.
- AFUDC in earnings 10.3%Construction credit in earningsEquity allowance for funds used during construction $181M ÷ net income $1.8B
What this means
While a plant is under construction the commission lets the utility credit itself the allowed return on the capital tied up — a real, allowed profit that arrives as a bookkeeping entry now and as cash only after the plant enters rates. A large share means heavy reinvestment at the allowed return, the thing Berkshire's utility letters prize; it also means that much of this year's earnings has not yet been collected from anyone.
The invested base and the regulatory ledger
- Net utility plant $52.9BGrowing ≈ 7.3%/yrUtility plant net of depreciation, as filed · FY2016→FY2025: $27.9B → $52.9B, ≈ 7.3%/yr
What this means
The closest filed figure to the rate base — the invested capital the commission sets the allowed return on. Its growth rate is the utility's reinvestment runway: under regulation, earnings power compounds roughly as fast as the base the return is earned on, funded by capital the regulator lets the company recover with interest. Rate base itself is not tagged in any structured filing, so this is the proxy, labeled as what it is.
- Regulatory assets & liabilities $5.0B / —As filedRegulatory assets $5.0B · regulatory liabilities not tagged, as filed
What this means
The ledger of the regulatory relationship: assets are costs the commission has agreed the utility may collect from ratepayers in future rates, liabilities are amounts it must give back. Both are promises whose worth depends entirely on the commissions that made them — which is why they are shown as filed and never netted into earnings adjustments here.
Graham’s defensive tests · 4 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $12.9B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity —Current ratio ≥ 2× (waived for utilities) · exempt
What this means
Graham exempted public utilities from this test: their working capital “takes care of itself” through the continuous bond-and-share financing of growth, so a thin current ratio is the industry's structure, not a warning. His substitute test — debt no more than twice book equity — is the next line.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ 2× equity (Graham's utility test) · $30.3B vs $16.9B equity
What this means
Graham's own substitution for public utilities: debt not exceeding twice the stock equity at book value, in place of the working-capital tests an industrial faces. A utility finances its plant with bonds by design; the question is whether the borrowing stays inside the equity behind it.
- Earnings stability NearA profit every year (10-yr record) · 1 loss year
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record PassUninterrupted dividends · paid every year (10)
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +664%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $3.69/share (latest year $3.77), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $36.27/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 9 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 1 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 3% → 23% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 3% early to 23% lately, median 15% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 11%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Owner earnings growth +15%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 15% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2016 · −7.5% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2016, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Jun 30, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$3.9B
- Receivables$1.6B
- Other current assets$2.8B
- Debt due within a year$1.5B
- Accounts payable$2.7B
- Other current liabilities$4.8B
From the company's latest filing.
Regulatory matters, in the filing’s words
For a rate-regulated utility the commission’s pen writes the economics. Two things it wrote here, quoted verbatim from the 10-K, gravest dollars first: costs the commission disallowed, and catastrophe or retirement costs moved off the meter through securitization bonds. Nothing below is computed; every figure is the filer’s own sentence.
Disallowances the filing records
- $ 68.9 millioncommission action
“In October 2023, Entergy Arkansas made a commitment to the APSC to make a filing to forgo its opportunity to seek recovery of the incremental fuel and purchased energy expense, among other identified costs, resulting from the ANO stator incident. As a result, in third quarter 2023, Entergy Arkansas recorded a write-off of its regulatory asset for deferred fuel of $ 68.9 million, which includes interest, related to the ANO stator incident.”
Costs financed through securitization bonds
- $ 2.57 billion$ 59.2 million$ 1.657 billionrequest or proceeding
“The settlement agreement contains the following key terms: $ 2.57 billion of restoration costs from Hurricane Ida, Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, Hurricane Zeta, and Winter Storm Uri were prudently incurred and eligible for recovery; carrying costs of $ 59.2 million were recoverable; and Entergy Louisiana was authorized to finance $ 1.657 billion utilizing the securitization process authorized by Act 55, as supplemented by Act 293.”
- $ 1.491 billion$ 180 millionrequest or proceeding
“In March 2023 the Hurricane Ida securitization financing closed, resulting in the issuance of approximately $ 1.491 billion principal amount of bonds by the LCDA and a remaining regulatory asset of $ 180 million to be recovered through the exclusion of the accumulated deferred income taxes related to damaged assets and system restoration costs from the determination of future rates.”
- $ 242.9 million$ 13.3 millionrequest or proceeding
“Entergy Texas Securitization Bonds - Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Winter Storm Uri In January 2022 the PUCT authorized the issuance of securitization bonds to recover $ 242.9 million of Entergy Texas's Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta, and Winter Storm Uri restoration costs, plus carrying costs, plus approximately $ 13.3 million relating to a system restoration regulatory asset related to Hurricane Harvey, plus up-front qualified costs.”
Sentences from the Regulatory Matters disclosures and MD&A of the latest 10-K, largest dollars first, at most three to a lane. “Commission action” and “bonds issued” mark sentences that carry the completed act in the filer’s own verb; everything else renders as a recording, request, or proceeding — never as a decided outcome. A filer with no qualifying sentence shows nothing here.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $32.3B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$37.0B · 114%
- Dividends$7.9B · 25%
- Returned to owners$7.9B
53% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $7.9B as dividends and $0 as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$12.6B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $12.6B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet: debt rose from $14.8B to $33.1B.
- Net change in share count30.3%
The diluted count rose from 358M to 466M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$2.39/sh
Paid in 10 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 4% a year. It was never cut over the span.
- Return on what it retained67%
Of the earnings it kept rather than paid out ($2.8B over the span), annual owner earnings (first three years vs last three) grew $1.9B, so each retained $1 added about 0.67 of yearly owner earnings. Buffett's test, run on owner earnings instead of market value.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $17.0M | $26.6M | $2.1B |
| 2022 | $13.2M | $17.6M | $600M |
| 2022 | $6.9M | $8.6M | $600M |
| 2023 | $10.4M | $7.0M | $2.2B |
| 2024 | $12.8M | $26.8M | $2.3B |
| 2025 | $16.8M | $21.8M | $2.8B |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
Peers, Electric Utilities
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | ROEmedian over the record | Plant growthannualized over the record | Dividend / cashmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIXEdison International | $19.3B | 6% | 6.2% | 25% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | $16.5B | 9% | — | 45% |
| DTBDTE Energy Co | $15.8B | 11% | 5.8% | 26% |
| FEFirstEnergy Corp. | $15.1B | 9% | 7.5% | 33% |
| ESEversource Energy (D/B/A) | $13.5B | 9% | 8.9% | 35% |
| ETREntergy Corporation | $12.9B | 10% | 7.3% | 25% |
| CNPCenterPoint Energy Inc (Holding Co) | $9.4B | 10% | — | 24% |
| PPLPPL Corporation | $9.0B | 9% | 1.5% | 42% |
| Group median | — | 9% | 6.8% | 29% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Entergy Corporation has delivered.
Entergy Corporation’s latest year shows negative owner earnings, the mark of a build-out: total capital spending outruns the cash the business throws off today. So the tool opens on the steady-state base (maintenance capex in place of the build-out spend), the cash it would earn at rest; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, Entergy Corporation earns about $1.7B on its 13.1% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 22.0% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.68% 10-year Treasury (Jul 30, 2026) + 4.32 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.68%, as of Jul 30, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Free cash flow ($3.0B) on 467M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-06-30; net debt $29.2B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. Capex ($9.0B) runs well above depreciation ($2.4B), so this is a build-out; Steady-state swaps total capex for maintenance (≈ depreciation), lifting the base to about $3.8B, the cash it would throw off if it stopped expanding. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← ETON its page in the Manual ETSY →
Industry order: ← ES the Electric Utilities chapter FE →