← All companies ← EQR Manual ERIE → ← EOG Oil & Gas Producers EXE →
EQT, EQT Corporation
We are a vertically integrated natural gas company with upstream, gathering and transmission operations focused in the Appalachian Basin.
Our operational strategy is further enhanced by our robust midstream pipelines and services, which are synchronized with the timing of our development plan.
Our synchronized development plan supports an integrated business model that keeps development costs low and limits our need to hedge future production.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report Est. 10/19–10/26 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~23 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has reached 38% at its best but run negative through the cycle (median −6.9%) on a 63% gross margin — so the question is which reading is truer: whether the median was pulled below zero by one-off charges, by the cycle, or by spending it is still growing into, and whether it settles back at a profit. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −146 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on the commodity price, and the cost to lift a barrel. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on supplier & input dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median −1%, above 15% in 0 of 10 years). By owner earnings: roughly 18% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $1.4B | $3.1B | $4.6B | $4.4B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $7.5B | $6.9B | $5.3B | $8.6B | $9.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| $507M | $1.9B | $2.9B | $2.7B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $5.4B | $4.8B | $3.4B | $7.1B | $8.0B | Gross profitGross prof. |
| 37% | 62% | 63% | 60% | 44% | 37% | 72% | 69% | 64% | 82% | 84% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 16% | 7% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 6% | 4% | 4% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| ($755M) | $382M | ($2.8B) | ($1.2B) | ($878M) | ($1.4B) | $2.7B | $2.3B | $685M | $3.2B | $4.0B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −54.4% | 12.4% | −61.1% | −26.1% | −28.7% | −44.4% | 36.3% | 33.5% | 13.0% | 37.6% | 42.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($894M) | $199M | ($3.1B) | ($1.6B) | ($1.3B) | ($1.6B) | $2.3B | $2.1B | $264M | $3.0B | — | Pretax incomePretax |
| ($453M) | $1.5B | ($2.2B) | ($1.2B) | ($959M) | ($1.1B) | $1.8B | $1.7B | $231M | $2.0B | $2.7B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | 24% | 18% | 8% | 22% | 24% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $1.1B | $1.6B | $3.0B | $1.9B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $3.5B | $3.2B | $2.8B | $5.1B | $6.2B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $856M | $971M | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $2.2B | $2.6B | $2.7B | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $616M | ($936M) | $3.6B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $1.1B | ($17M) | ($338M) | $276M | $426M | $759M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $943M | $1.6B | $3.0B | $1.6B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.4B | $2.0B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.5B | CapexCapex |
| 68.0% | 50.4% | 65.8% | 36.3% | 34.1% | 34.4% | 18.7% | 29.2% | 42.7% | 26.5% | 26.1% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $122M | $667M | $1.4B | $249M | $495M | $607M | $2.1B | $1.2B | $573M | $2.8B | $3.8B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 8.8% | 21.6% | 30.9% | 5.6% | 16.2% | 19.8% | 27.5% | 16.8% | 10.9% | 32.8% | 39.4% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $122M | $79M | ($23M) | $249M | $495M | $607M | $2.1B | $1.2B | $573M | $2.8B | $3.8B | Free cash flowFCF |
| 8.8% | 2.5% | −0.5% | 5.6% | 16.2% | 19.8% | 27.5% | 16.8% | 10.9% | 32.8% | 39.4% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $0 | $2.4B | $0 | $0 | $692M | $1.0B | $205M | $2.3B | $874M | $484M | $383M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| $20M | $21M | $31M | $31M | $8M | $0 | $204M | $228M | $327M | $390M | $408M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| $30K | $30K | $27K | $0 | $0 | $13M | $409M | $201M | $0 | $0 | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| ($2.9B) | ($4.2B) | ($4.0B) | ($1.6B) | ($1.6B) | ($2.1B) | ($1.4B) | ($4.3B) | ($1.6B) | ($2.8B) | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| $1.4B | $1.5B | $859M | ($249M) | $32M | $506M | ($699M) | ($243M) | ($1.1B) | ($2.4B) | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| — | — | ($144M) | $1M | $14M | $96M | $1.3B | ($1.4B) | $121M | ($91M) | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| -7% | 2% | -14% | -6% | -5% | -7% | 13% | 9% | 2% | 8% | 10% | ROICROIC |
| -8% | 11% | -20% | -12% | -10% | -11% | 16% | 12% | 1% | 9% | 11% | Return on equityROE |
| −8% | 11% | −21% | −13% | −10% | −11% | 14% | 10% | −0% | 7% | 9% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $1.1B | $26M | $3M | $5M | $18M | $114M | $1.5B | $81M | $202M | $111M | $129M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $342M | $665M | $1.2B | $610M | $567M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $824M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $835M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $310M | $726M | $1.1B | $796M | $705M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.2B | Accounts payablePayables |
| $32M | ($62M) | $182M | ($186M) | ($139M) | $99M | $33M | ($449M) | ($45M) | $91M | ($332M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $1.8B | $1.2B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $2.3B | $4.0B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $1.2B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $805M | $1.2B | $2.4B | $1.3B | $1.8B | $5.2B | $3.7B | $2.0B | $2.5B | $2.5B | $1.8B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 2.3× | 0.9× | 0.8× | 1.3× | 0.7× | 0.4× | 1.1× | 1.0× | 0.7× | 0.8× | 0.7× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $13.2B | $19.7B | $17.4B | $16.2B | $16.1B | $18.4B | $18.2B | $23.0B | $31.7B | $33.6B | — | Net PP&ENet PP&E |
| $0 | $471M | $0 | — | — | — | — | $0 | $2.1B | $2.1B | $2.1B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $15.5B | $29.5B | $20.7B | $18.8B | $18.1B | $21.6B | $22.7B | $25.3B | $39.8B | $41.8B | $41.3B | Total assetsAssets |
| $3.3B | $4.7B | $4.7B | $5.3B | $4.9B | $5.6B | $5.7B | $5.8B | $9.3B | $7.8B | $5.7B | Total debtDebt |
| $2.2B | $4.7B | $4.7B | $5.3B | $4.9B | $5.5B | $4.2B | $5.7B | $9.1B | $7.7B | $5.5B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| -5.8× | 2.3× | -12.2× | -5.8× | -3.4× | -4.7× | 10.9× | 10.5× | 1.5× | 7.4× | 10.4× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $6.4B | $11.1B | $9.8B | $9.0B | $8.9B | $11.6B | $11.5B | $10.5B | $15.6B | $14.4B | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| $3.3B | $5.1B | — | $0 | $7M | $16M | $41M | $8M | $3.7B | $3.6B | — | Noncontrolling interestsNCI |
| $5.9B | $13.3B | $11.0B | $9.8B | $9.3B | $10.0B | $11.2B | $14.8B | $20.6B | $23.8B | $25.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 3.2% | 3.1% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 3.0% | 0.7% | 0.8% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 167M | 188M | 261M | 255M | 261M | 323M | 406M | 413M | 515M | 616M | 629M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $8.31 | $16.47 | $17.47 | $17.31 | $11.74 | $9.48 | $18.44 | $16.72 | $10.25 | $14.04 | $15.16 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-2.71 | $8.04 | $-8.60 | $-4.79 | $-3.68 | $-3.54 | $4.36 | $4.20 | $0.45 | $3.31 | $4.31 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $0.73 | $3.55 | $5.39 | $0.98 | $1.90 | $1.88 | $5.08 | $2.81 | $1.11 | $4.61 | $5.97 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $0.73 | $0.42 | $-0.09 | $0.98 | $1.90 | $1.88 | $5.08 | $2.81 | $1.11 | $4.61 | $5.97 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.12 | $0.11 | $0.12 | $0.12 | $0.03 | $0.00 | $0.50 | $0.55 | $0.63 | $0.63 | $0.65 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $5.65 | $8.30 | $11.49 | $6.28 | $4.00 | $3.26 | $3.45 | $4.89 | $4.38 | $3.72 | $3.95 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $35.10 | $70.95 | $42.00 | $38.42 | $35.51 | $30.80 | $27.48 | $35.75 | $40.03 | $38.58 | $40.15 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +6.0%/yr | +3.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +22.8%/yr | +19.4%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +20.2%/yr | +84.7%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −4.5%/yr | −1.5%/yr |
| Book value / share | +1.1%/yr | +1.7%/yr |
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $2.0B of profit into $2.8B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $2.0B | $231M | $1.7B | $1.8B | ($1.1B) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$2.6B | +$2.2B | +$1.7B | +$1.7B | +$1.7B |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$61M | +$158M | +$50M | +$45M | +$28M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$426M | +$276M | −$338M | −$17M | +$1.1B |
| Cash from operations | $5.1B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $3.5B | $1.7B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$2.3B | −$2.3B | −$2.0B | −$1.4B | −$1.1B |
| Owner earnings | $2.8B | $573M | $1.2B | $2.1B | $607M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 33% | 11% | 17% | 28% | 20% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $61M), owner earnings is nearer $2.8B.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ComfortableOperating income $3.2B ÷ interest expense $439M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient, it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $7.7B · 2.4× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash $111M − debt $7.8B
What this means
Netting $111M of cash and short-term investments against $7.8B of debt leaves $7.7B owed, about 2.4× a year's operating profit. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle10-yr median, range -14%–13%; 8% latest = NOPAT $2.5B ÷ invested capital $31.4BIndustry peers: median 7%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 10 years (it ran 8% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- High through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 6%–33%; latest $2.8B = operating cash $5.1B − maintenance capex $2.3BIndustry peers: median 24%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 33% of revenue this year, a 18% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $61M of SBC) leaves $2.8B.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $5.1B ÷ net income $2.0B
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $390M ÷ Owner Earnings $2.8B — this fiscal year
What this means
Of $2.8B Owner Earnings, $390M (14%) went back to shareholders, $390M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it is the mark of a mature business with little left to reinvest at a high return; reinvesting most could mean a long runway, or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does. This year's proportion is 14%; across the record (2016–2025) it is 18%, the capital-allocation section below.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.88×MaintainingCapex $2.3B ÷ depreciation $2.6B
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
The promise and the pay packet
- Is the buyback buying ownership, or mopping up? 0.7%The count is risingStock compensation $61M (fiscal 2025), 0.7% of revenue · no repurchases · diluted shares +51.5% since 2022
What this means
Stock handed to employees is a real cost paid in the owner's own currency: it is charged against profit, but the shares it creates are permanent. Many companies repurchase stock at the same time, which looks like a return of capital and often is not — if the count barely moves, the cash merely cancelled the pay packet and bought the owner nothing. The three states worth telling apart are a count genuinely shrinking, a count standing still despite large repurchases, and a count rising because the issuance was never offset at all.
The reserves, and what it costs to keep them
- A normal share awaiting capitalProved undeveloped reserves ÷ total proved reserves
What this means
Proved reserves come in two kinds and the difference matters. Developed reserves sit behind wells that already exist. Undeveloped reserves are booked on management's intent to drill them within five years, and turning them into production requires capital the company has not yet spent. A high share is not by itself a fault, since a company with a long drilling inventory has somewhere to put its money, but it does mean the reserve figure describes a plan as much as an asset, and the plan can be revised away.
“In the course of its audit, NSAI conducted a detailed review of 100 % of the total net natural gas, NGLs and oil proved reserves attributable to the Company's interests as of December 31, 2025.”
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 5 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $8.6B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 0.76×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt MissDebt ≤ working capital · $7.8B vs ($590M) WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (10-yr record) · 5 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record NearUninterrupted dividends · 9 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth —Earnings +33% over the record · —
What this means
Earnings were negative early in the record, a growth rate isn't meaningful.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $2.13/share (latest year $3.26), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $37.97/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 5 of 10
What this means
Lost money in 5 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 0 of 10 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin −34% → 28% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about −34% early to 28% lately, median −26% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 19%
What this means
Every extra dollar the business reinvested came back at a high incremental return — the lens GBM read for a moat that reinvests rather than merely harvests. The record and the 10-K are where you check whether the rate holds.
- Owner earnings growth +18%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 18% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2018 · −61.1% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2018, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Jun 30, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$113M
- Receivables$835M
- Other current assets$230M
- Debt due within a year$115M
- Accounts payable$1.2B
- Other current liabilities$468M
Its current ratio is below 1, which usually reads as strain; here it is likely structural strength. What it owes in the near term is money to suppliers and customers (payables and deferred revenue), not to lenders, so the balance sheet is funded by operating float, the way Costco's and Amazon's are. The low ratio can be the edge, not the risk; the cash-conversion cycle and the debt due above say which.
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $25.3B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a reinvestor, most operating cash is plowed back into the business.
- Reinvested$17.2B · 68%
- Dividends$1.3B · 5%
- Buybacks$624M · 2%
- Retained (debt / cash)$6.3B · 25%
- Returned to owners$1.9B
18% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $1.3B as dividends and $624M as buybacks.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $624M over the span, but a stock split in the window left the reported buyback-share counts on a basis the diluted-share count doesn't match, so a comparable average price can't be drawn.
- Net change in share count276.7%
The diluted count rose from 167M to 629M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$0.63/sh
Paid in 9 of the years on record, the per-share dividend growing about 20% a year. It was cut at least once along the way.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
$531M written down across 1 year (2018): goodwill the company has already conceded it overpaid for, charged against earnings. A write-down costs no cash (the cash went out when the deal was signed), but it is management marking its own past judgment to market.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and write-downs summed across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Toby Z. Rice | $16.9M | $37.2M | $607M |
| 2022 | Mr. Toby Z. Rice | $11.6M | $46.1M | $2.1B |
| 2023 | Mr. Toby Z. Rice | $10.6M | $23.4M | $1.2B |
| 2024 | Mr. Toby Z. Rice | $11.3M | $26.4M | $573M |
| 2025 | Mr. Toby Z. Rice | $16.1M | $26.0M | $2.8B |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership<1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio103:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$61M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 0.7% of revenue, equal to 1.9% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Who stands behind the reserve estimates?Netherland, Sewell & Associates — the filing’s word: “audit” — “100 % of the total net natural gas, NGLs and oil proved reserves”
“In the course of its audit, NSAI conducted a detailed review of 100 % of the total net natural gas, NGLs and oil proved reserves attributable to the Company's interests as of December 31, 2025.”verify →
- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Oil & gas reserve estimates, Depletion & DD&A, Asset retirement obligations as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Oil & Gas Producers
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Gross marginmedian over the record | Op. marginmedian over the record | ROICmedian over the record | Owner earn. marginmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DVNDevon Energy Corporation | $16.8B | 53%4y | 20.7% | 12% | 20% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | $15.0B | — | 43.1% | 7% | 46% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corporation | $12.1B | — | -0.9% | -0% | 5% |
| OVVOvintiv | $8.9B | — | 17.5% | 12% | 17% |
| EQTEQT Corporation | $8.6B | 63% | -6.9% | -1% | 18% |
| CTRACoterra Energy Inc. | $7.3B | — | 34.8% | 9% | 33% |
| PRPermian Resources | $5.1B | — | 31.8% | 7% | 50% |
| CHRDChord Energy | $4.9B | 80%3y | 8.1% | 1% | 24% |
| Group median | — | 63% | 19.1% | 7% | 22% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what EQT Corporation has delivered.
EQT Corporation’s latest year runs above its own through-cycle margin — the reported figure may flatter a peak. So the tool opens on the through-cycle base, Graham’s averaging cutting both ways; clear the toggle below to read the latest year exactly as reported.
Through the cycle, EQT Corporation earns about $1.6B on its 18.3% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 32.8% margin runs above that; the reported figure may flatter a peak you'd be paying on. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year. It comes pre-checked here for that reason, the same rule that already normalizes a trough; clear it to price the year as filed.
—
9.0% = the 4.68% 10-year Treasury (Jul 30, 2026) + 4.32 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.68%, as of Jul 30, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $3.8B on 626M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-07-14; net debt $5.5B. The base opens on the through-cycle figure (the latest year sits above the record’s own median, and Graham’s averaging cuts both ways); clear Normalize to use the year as filed. Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← EQR its page in the Manual ERIE →
Industry order: ← EOG the Oil & Gas Producers chapter EXE →