Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← VNDA Manual VNOM → ← SLG REITs — Office

VNO, Vornado Realty Trust

Vornado is a fully integrated REIT and conducts its business through, and substantially all of its interests in properties are held by, the Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership.

We expect to finance our growth from acquisitions, developments, redevelopments and investments using internally generated funds and proceeds from asset sales and by accessing the public and private capital markets.

During 2024, we fully funded our share of equity and cash contributions. 623 Fifth Avenue Office Condominium We are redeveloping the 623 Fifth Avenue office condominium, a 36-story, 383,000 square foot building situated above the flagship Saks Fifth Avenue department store, into a premier boutique office building.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
VNO · Vornado Realty Trust
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$1.8B
+1.3% YoY · 3% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $1.8B 5-yr avg $1.8B
Cash margin 21% 5-yr avg 46%
Dividend / operating cash 36% 5-yr avg 32%

Next report Est. 11/2–11/5 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~35 days after · the wire records it on arrival

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What it is
Revenue is New York (82%) and Other (18%).
What moves the needle
Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on concentrated dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Operating cash per share has been roughly flat (2% a year). The dividend takes 36% of FFO, and is covered. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

Where the money comes from

read the 10-K →

New York is 82% of revenue, with Other the other meaningful segment at 18%.

Revenue by reportable segment, FY2025
  • New York82%$1.5B
  • Other18%$334M

From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMJun 2026
Income statement
$2.0B$2.1B$2.2B$1.9B$1.5B$1.6B$1.8B$1.8B$1.8B$1.8B$1.8BRevenueRevenue
$907M$227M$450M$3.1B($297M)$176M($346M)$105M$70M$905M$68MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
$595M$530M$473M$439M$418M$433M$526M$458M$469M$481M$540MDepreciation & amortizationD&A
$995M$860M$803M$663M$424M$762M$799M$648M$538M$1.3B$391MCash from operationsOp. cash
$476M$496M$479M$504M$827M$406M$407M$129M$141M$141M$141MDividends paidDiv. paid
Balance sheet
48%58%60%76%195%53%51%20%26%11%36%Dividend / operating cashPayout
Cash flow & returns
($893M)($206M)($878M)$2.5B($88M)($532M)($907M)($129M)($597M)$116MInvesting cash flowInv. cash
($446M)($338M)($1.1B)($2.2B)($213M)($29M)($801M)($279M)($252M)($1.3B)Financing cash flowFin. cash
($344M)$315M($1.2B)$890M$123M$200M($909M)$240M($312M)$28MChange in cashΔ cash
Balance sheet
$14.2B$14.8B$16.2B$13.1B$12.1B$13.2B$13.3B$13.8B$14.1B$14.3B$14.6BReal estate (gross)RE gross
$20.8B$17.4B$17.2B$18.3B$16.2B$17.3B$16.5B$16.2B$16.0B$15.5B$15.6BTotal assetsAssets
$1.3B$1.6B$1.7B$1.8B$1.8B$2.6B$2.6B$2.6B$2.6B$2.3B$2.6BTotal debtDebt
($168M)($225M)$1.1B$252M$194M$802M$1.2B$1.6B$1.8B$1.4B$1.9BNet debt / (cash)Net debt
$330M$346M$348M$287M$229M$231M$280M$349M$390M$354M$349MInterest expenseInt. exp.
1.8×1.8×1.7×12.3×-0.1×1.7×-0.2×1.4×1.2×3.6×1.7×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$11.9B$11.4B$11.3B$10.1B$8.7B$10.1B$10.0B$9.8B$9.8B$8.7BTotal liabilitiesTotal liab.
$1.3B$985M$784M$889M$606M$689M$437M$638M$835M$648MRedeemable interestsRedeemable
$720M$670M$643M$579M$415M$279M$237M$196M$179M$170MNoncontrolling interestsNCI
$6.9B$4.3B$4.5B$6.7B$6.5B$6.2B$5.8B$5.5B$5.2B$6.0B$5.8BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
190M191M191M191M191M192M192M192M197M201M188MShares out (diluted)Shares
$2.50$2.60$2.51$2.64$4.33$2.11$2.12$0.67$0.72$0.70$0.75Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$36.27$22.68$23.34$35.24$34.18$32.46$30.45$28.71$26.23$29.78$30.71Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share−1.7%/yr+2.4%/yr
Owner earnings / share+4.6%/yr+16.7%/yr
EPS−0.6%/yr
Dividends / share−13.2%/yr−30.5%/yr
Capital spending / share−3.5%/yr+200.2%/yr
Book value / share−2.2%/yr−2.7%/yr
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • A range, because the filings do not split maintenance from expansion
    Between cash from operations less all capital spending $1.3B − $297M = $962M, and cash from operations $1.3B
    What this means

    Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.

  • Strong against cost
    Cash from operations $1.3B ÷ real estate at cost $14.3B
    What this means

    The cash the properties throw off, measured against what they cost to acquire and build rather than against a market value nobody filed. Read it across the record: a portfolio whose yield on cost is rising is either raising rents faster than it is adding buildings, or buying well. Gross cost is used deliberately, so accumulated depreciation cannot shrink the denominator and flatter the return.

  • Lightly covered
    Dividends $141M ÷ cash from operations $1.3B
    Occupancy at fiscal year end, in the filing’s words
    Occupancy, as filed — the scope is the sentence’s own words90.0%
    “As of December 31, 2025, the occupancy rate for our New York segment was 90.0%.”
    Occupancy, as filed — the scope is the sentence’s own words88.9%
    “As of December 31, 2025, 555 California Street had an occupancy rate of 88.9%, which reflects the impact of lease expirations at 315 Montgomery Street during the fourth quarter, and a weighted average annual rent per square foot of $103.50.”

    Two same-scope occupancy sentences in this filing disagree, so neither is quoted as the fact here. Read the filing linked above.

    ✓ each figure is its sentence’s own characters, dated to the fiscal year end inside the sentence
    What this means

    A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether the cash covers it. This is a harder test than the industry's usual one: funds from operations adds depreciation back without deducting the capital that genuinely keeps buildings competitive, so a distribution can look covered on that measure and still be funded by borrowing or by selling buildings. Above 100% of operating cash, it is being funded by something other than the properties.

  • Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
    What this means

    Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.

Is it sound?

  • Not cleanly captured
    Industry peers: median 35%
    What this means

    This REIT tags its borrowings in a way the pipeline could not fully total, so we decline to show a leverage figure rather than a misleadingly low one. The debt schedule in the 10-K is where to read its true leverage.

  • Adequate
    (operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $393M (including $39M charged into development)
    Industry peers: median 3.6×
    What this means

    How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. The bill counted here is every dollar of interest the trust incurred, including the part it charged into the cost of buildings under construction rather than against this year's earnings — that money is paid to lenders all the same, and leaving it out flatters exactly the trusts doing the most building. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.

  • Consolidated accounts only
    What this means

    These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Debt by another name. What the business owes on the property, aircraft, stores and equipment it rents rather than owns is a fixed claim due on a schedule; added back to the debt, it is the true leverage. That ladder, and what it adds to the debt on the page above.

'26$45M
'27$46M
'28$47M
'29$47M
'30$48M
later$1.8B

Lease payments by year, scaled to the largest; “later” is everything beyond year five, shown apart. These are the contractual cash payments, before the interest the filing imputes back out to the balance-sheet liability.

Due in the next 12 months$45Ma fixed cash payment, owed whether or not the business has a good year
Total lease payments$2.0Bevery year plus the tail, undiscounted: the full cash the leases will take
On the balance sheet$700Mthe present value of those payments, the recognised lease liability

True leverage: debt plus leases

On-balance-sheet debt$2.3B
Lease obligations (present value)$700M
Total fixed claims on the business$3.0B

Counting the leases the way Buffett does, the fixed claims on this business come to $3.0B, of which the leases are 24%. The lease wall above and the debt schedule together are the calendar of what must be paid, and when.

Lease ladder read from the ASC 842 tags in the company’s Dec 31, 2025 annual report and reconciled: the yearly buckets sum to the undiscounted total, which less the imputed interest equals the balance-sheet liability; a ladder that doesn’t tie out is withheld.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2022Steven Roth$9.9M−$4.9M$796M
2022Steven Roth$9.9M−$4.9M$796M
2023Steven Roth$26.8M$62.9M$615M
2023Steven Roth$26.8M$62.9M$615M
2024Steven Roth$2.9M$68.4M$538M
2024Steven Roth$2.9M$68.4M$538M
2025Steven Roth$3.1M−$32.2M$962M
2025Steven Roth$3.1M−$32.2M$962M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership9.3%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$25M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 1.4% of revenue, equal to 4.4% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Revenue recognition, Acquisitions as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Office REITs

The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.

CompanyRevenuelatest FY, USDCash marginmedian over the recordCash / assetsmedian over the recordDividend / cashmedian over the recordDebt / assetsmedian over the record
BXPBXP Inc.$3.5B40%5.1%56%40%
AREAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.$3.0B47%3.8%63%35%
VNOVornado Realty Trust$1.8B39%4.5%52%15%2y
KRCKilroy Realty$1.1B52%5.1%46%39%
DEIDouglas Emmett$1.0B48%4.7%38%53%
SLGSL Green Realty$1.0B30%2.7%88%27%
CUZCousins Properties$994M46%4.8%48%31%
ESRTEmpire State Realty Trust Inc.$768M32%5.5%16%20%
Group median43%4.7%50%33%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

A reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Vornado Realty Trust (VNO), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/VNO, data as of 2026-08-17.

Manual order: ← VNDA its page in the Manual VNOM →

Industry order: ← SLG the REITs — Office chapter