← All companies ← FRST Manual FSBC → ← CURB REITs — Retail IVT →
FRT, Federal Realty Investment Trust
Federal Realty Investment Trust is an equity real estate investment trust.
Our portfolio includes, and we continue to acquire and redevelop, high quality retail in many formats ranging from regional, community and neighborhood shopping centers that often are anchored by grocery stores to mixed-use properties that are typically centered around a retail component but also include residential and office components.
We continuously evaluate and assess our operating strategies to ensure they are effective and put us in the best position to address changes in the market.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on cyclicality & demand, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Operating cash per share has been roughly flat (2% a year). Debt is 55% of assets, moderate for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
Revenue up 7.7% year over year; operating income down 31.6%
“Operating Income Operating income decreased $64.1 million, or 31.6%, to $138.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to $202.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2025. This decrease is primarily driven by lower gains on sale of real estate, the prior year income related to the sale of new market tax credits, and property dispositions, partially offset by acquisitions, openings at Santana West, and higher rental rates and average occupancy.”
figures computed from the filing's XBRL; the words are the company's
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $802M | $857M | $915M | $936M | $835M | $951M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | RevenueRevenue |
| $250M | $290M | $242M | $354M | $132M | $261M | $385M | $237M | $295M | $411M | $436M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $194M | $216M | $244M | $240M | $255M | $280M | $302M | $322M | $343M | $368M | $391M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $428M | $459M | $517M | $462M | $370M | $471M | $517M | $556M | $575M | $622M | $631M | Cash from operationsOp. cash |
| ($590M) | ($838M) | ($192M) | ($317M) | ($368M) | ($660M) | ($786M) | ($358M) | ($447M) | ($743M) | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| $169M | $369M | ($241M) | ($100M) | $662M | ($453M) | $190M | ($34M) | ($252M) | $103M | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| $6M | ($10M) | $83M | $45M | $663M | ($642M) | ($79M) | $164M | ($125M) | ($18M) | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $6.8B | $7.6B | $7.8B | $8.3B | $8.6B | $9.4B | $10.1B | $10.5B | $10.9B | $11.6B | $11.7B | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $5.4B | $6.3B | $6.3B | $6.8B | $7.6B | $7.6B | $8.2B | $8.4B | $8.5B | $9.1B | $9.1B | Total assetsAssets |
| 52% | 52% | 51% | 50% | 57% | 53% | 53% | 55% | 53% | 54% | 55% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $2.8B | $3.3B | $3.2B | $3.4B | $4.3B | $4.1B | $4.3B | $4.6B | $4.5B | $5.0B | $5.0B | Total debtDebt |
| $2.8B | $3.3B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $3.5B | $3.9B | $4.3B | $4.4B | $4.4B | $4.9B | $4.9B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $95M | $100M | $110M | $110M | $136M | $128M | $137M | $168M | $175M | $184M | $196M | Interest expenseInt. exp. |
| 3.4× | 4.1× | 3.3× | 4.3× | 2.1× | 3.1× | 3.8× | 2.4× | 2.7× | 3.3× | 3.3× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $3.2B | $3.7B | $3.7B | $4.0B | $4.9B | $4.7B | $5.0B | $5.2B | $5.1B | $5.6B | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| $144M | $141M | $136M | $140M | $138M | $214M | $178M | $183M | $180M | $182M | — | Redeemable interestsRedeemable |
| $99M | $125M | $121M | $101M | $85M | $83M | $80M | $79M | $73M | $70M | — | Noncontrolling interestsNCI |
| $2.0B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.5B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $3.0B | $3.0B | $3.2B | $3.2B | $3.4B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 71.0M | 72.2M | 73.3M | 74.8M | 75.5M | 77.4M | 80.5M | 81.3M | 83.6M | 86.4M | 86.2M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $27.82 | $31.38 | $32.00 | $33.91 | $32.63 | $33.35 | $36.69 | $36.45 | $37.95 | $37.60 | $39.04 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +3.1%/yr | +6.0%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −0.9%/yr (3-yr) | −0.9%/yr (3-yr) |
| EPS | +3.4%/yr | +22.2%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +11.0%/yr (3-yr) | +11.0%/yr (3-yr) |
| Book value / share | +3.4%/yr | +2.9%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Operating income+27.5%
“Operating Income Operating income increased $129.8 million, or 27.5%, to $602.2 million in 2025 compared to $472.4 million in 2024. This increase is primarily driven by higher gains on sale of real estate, higher rental rates and average occupancy, income related to the sale of the new market tax credits, and 2025 and 2024 acquisitions, partially offset by property dispositions, impairment charge, and higher collectibility related adjustments.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- Before capital spendingCash from operations $622M · capital spending not separately filed
What this means
Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.
- Ordinary for propertyCash from operations $622M ÷ real estate at cost $11.6B
What this means
The cash the properties throw off, measured against what they cost to acquire and build rather than against a market value nobody filed. Read it across the record: a portfolio whose yield on cost is rising is either raising rents faster than it is adding buildings, or buying well. Gross cost is used deliberately, so accumulated depreciation cannot shrink the denominator and flatter the return.
- Not enough data
What this means
No dividends are tagged in the structured data within the record's window — either none were paid, or the filer reports them under a variant tag the pipeline does not yet read. The financing section of the 10-K settles which.
- Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
What this means
Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.
Is it sound?
- Debt / assets 54%ElevatedTotal debt $5.0B ÷ assets $9.1BIndustry peers: median 45%
What this means
Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.
- Strong(operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $197M (including $13M charged into development)Industry peers: median 3.7×
What this means
How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. The bill counted here is every dollar of interest the trust incurred, including the part it charged into the cost of buildings under construction rather than against this year's earnings — that money is paid to lenders all the same, and leaving it out flatters exactly the trusts doing the most building. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.
- Consolidated accounts only
What this means
These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Net income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Wood | $7.5M | $15.4M | $261M |
| 2022 | Mr. Wood | $8.9M | $6.6M | $385M |
| 2023 | Mr. Wood | $8.9M | $10.0M | $237M |
| 2024 | Mr. Wood | $9.2M | $11.3M | $295M |
| 2025 | Mr. Wood | $9.9M | $8.4M | $411M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Net income is the whole business's, as filed, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership1.1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio76:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$15M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 1.1% of revenue, equal to 2.4% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Peers, Retail REITs
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Cash marginmedian over the record | Cash / assetsmedian over the record | Dividend / cashmedian over the record | Debt / assetsmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIMKimco Realty Corporation (HC) | $2.1B | 51% | 5.2% | 66% | 39% |
| REGRegency Centers Corporation | $1.6B | 54% | 5.9% | 62% | 35% |
| BRXBrixmor | $1.4B | 46% | 6.6% | 53% | 60% |
| FRTFederal Realty Investment Trust | $1.3B | 49% | 6.8% | — | 53% |
| MACMacerich | $1.0B | 35% | 3.9% | 87% | 51% |
| KRGKite Realty Group Trust | $844M | 44% | 5.0% | 56% | 45% |
| PECOPhillips Edison | $727M | 45% | 5.2% | 46% | 45% |
| CBLCBL & Associates Properties Inc. | $578M | 38% | 7.5% | 31% | 76% |
| Group median | — | 45% | 5.6% | — | 48% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFA reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).
Manual order: ← FRST its page in the Manual FSBC →
Industry order: ← CURB the REITs — Retail chapter IVT →